Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme

Yıl 2019, , 261 - 278, 29.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.618383

Öz

Bu
araştırmanın amacı, fikri mülkiyet haklarının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki
etkisini incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda geliştirilen hipotez panel veri analiz
yöntemiyle test edilmiştir. Araştırma, 35 gelişmiş-54 gelişmekte olan ülkeyi ve
1996-2010 dönemini içermektedir. Araştırmanın analiz bulgularına göre; fikri
mülkiyet haklarının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi, ülkelerin gelişmişlik
düzeyine göre farklılık göstermektedir. Gelişmiş
ülkelerde fikri mülkiyet hakları ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif ve anlamlı
bir etkiye sahipken, gelişmekte olan ülkelerde fikri mülkiyet haklarının
ekonomik büyüme üzerinde istatistiki olarak anlamlı herhangi bir etkisi tespit
edilememiştir. Bu sonuçlar, uluslararası anlaşma ve sözleşmelerle ülkelerin
fikri mülkiyet haklarını belli bir standart içerisinde uyumlaştırırken,
ekonomik büyümeye etkilerinin farklılaştırdığını göstermesi açısından son
derece önemlidir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TÜBİTAK), Bilim İnsanı Destekleme Daire Başkanlığı (BİDEB)

Proje Numarası

1059B141600828

Kaynakça

  • Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Barro, J. R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  • Evan, T., Vazarova, P. ve Bolotov, I. (2018). Some Effects of Intellectual Property Protection on National Economies: Theoretical and Econometric Study. Prague Economic Papers, 27(1), 73–91.
  • Falvey, R., Foster, N. ve Greenaway, D. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700–719
  • Furukawa, Y. (2007). The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and Endogenous Growth: Is Stronger Always Better?. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 31 (11), 3644–3670.
  • Gould, M. D. ve Gruben, C. W. (1996). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 323-350.
  • Greene, H. W. (2012). Econometric Analysis. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Grossman, M. G. ve Lai, E. C. (2002). International Protection of Intellectual Property, CESifo Working Paper, 790, 1-37.
  • Halbert, D. (2005). Globalized Resistance to Intellectual Property. 03 Mart 2019 tarihinde http://globalization.icaap.org/content/v5.2/halbert.html sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Hu, J., Chen, H. ve Tsai, F. (2014). Exploring the Endogenous Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Economic Growth. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 35(3), 255-274.
  • Hu, A. ve Png, I. (2013). Patent Rights and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross-Country Panels of Manufacturing Industries. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(3), 675-698.
  • Islam, N. (1995). Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127-1170.
  • Janjua, Z. P. ve Samad, G. (2007). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth: The Case of Middle Income Developing Countries. The Pakistan Development Review, 16(4), 711-722.
  • Kennedy, P. (2008). A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Lee, K. ve Lee, H. C. (2008). The Miracle to Crisis and the Mirage of The Postcrisis Reform in Korea: Assessment After Ten Years. Journal of Asian Economics, 19 (5), 425-437.
  • Lerner, J. (2009). The Empirical Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation: Puzzles and Clues. American Economic Review, 99(2), 343–348.
  • Liu, W. (2016). Intellectual Property Rights, FDI, R&D and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis. The World Economy, 39(7), 983-1004.
  • Magic, P. (2003). International Technology Transfer & Intellectual Property Rights. 18.02.2019 tarihindehttp://www.mba.intercol.edu/Entrepreneurship/UT%20Computer%20Science%20Course/Peter_Magic_International_IP_Rights.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Mankiw, G. N., Romer, D. ve Weil, N. D. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), 407-437.
  • Maskus, E. K (1997). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer. Conference of Public-Private Initiatives After TRIPS: Brüksel.
  • Maskus, E. K (2000). Intellectual Property Rights in The Global Economy. Washington: Institute for International Economics.
  • Maskus, E. K (2014). The New Globalisation of Intellectual Property Rights: What’s New This Time? Australian Economic History Review, 54(3), 262-284.
  • Mohtadi, H. ve Ruediger, S. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights and Growth: Is there a Threshold Effect?. International Economic Journal, 28(1), 1-42.
  • Park. W. (2005). Do Intellectual Property Rights Stimulate R&D and Productivity Growth? Evidence from Cross-national and Manufacturing Industries Data. J Putnam (Ed), Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Economy içinde (ss. 1-51). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
  • Parkin, M. (2003). Economics, Cambridge: Addison Wesley.
  • Schneider, H. P. (2005). International Trade, Economic Growth and Intellectual Property Rights: A Panel Data Study of Developed and Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics,78(2), 529 – 547.
  • Seyeum, B. (1996). The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Foreign Direct Investment. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(1), 50-59.
  • Solow, M. R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  • Tanaka, H. ve Iwaisako, T. (2014). Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment: A Welfare Analysis. European Economic Review, 67, 107–124.
  • Tatoğlu Yerdelen, F. (2013). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım.
  • Thompson, A. M. ve Rushing, W. F. (1996). An Ampirical Analysis of the Impact of Patent Protection on Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Development, 21(2), 61-77.

The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights On Economic Growth: An Empirical Study

Yıl 2019, , 261 - 278, 29.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.618383

Öz

The
purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of intellectual property rights
on economic growth. Panel data analysis method is employed to test the
hypotheses which developed for this purpose. The data set of the study covers
35 developed and 54 developing countries for the 1996-2010 period. According to
the empirical findings; the impact of intellectual property rights on economic
growth varies according to the level of development of countries. Effect of
intellectual property rights on economic growth is positive and statistically
significant in developed countries, whereas statistically significant
relationship has not been found between intellectual property rights and
economic growth in developing countries. These results indicate that the
expected homogenizing effect of the international agreements and conventions is
not currently shown. Therefore, especially in developing countries, the legal
arrangements regarding intellectual property rights should be implement
according to the needs of the inventors and entrepreneurs.

Proje Numarası

1059B141600828

Kaynakça

  • Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Barro, J. R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
  • Evan, T., Vazarova, P. ve Bolotov, I. (2018). Some Effects of Intellectual Property Protection on National Economies: Theoretical and Econometric Study. Prague Economic Papers, 27(1), 73–91.
  • Falvey, R., Foster, N. ve Greenaway, D. (2006). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth. Review of Development Economics, 10(4), 700–719
  • Furukawa, Y. (2007). The Protection of Intellectual Property Rights and Endogenous Growth: Is Stronger Always Better?. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 31 (11), 3644–3670.
  • Gould, M. D. ve Gruben, C. W. (1996). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 323-350.
  • Greene, H. W. (2012). Econometric Analysis. London: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Grossman, M. G. ve Lai, E. C. (2002). International Protection of Intellectual Property, CESifo Working Paper, 790, 1-37.
  • Halbert, D. (2005). Globalized Resistance to Intellectual Property. 03 Mart 2019 tarihinde http://globalization.icaap.org/content/v5.2/halbert.html sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Hu, J., Chen, H. ve Tsai, F. (2014). Exploring the Endogenous Relationship between Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Economic Growth. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 35(3), 255-274.
  • Hu, A. ve Png, I. (2013). Patent Rights and Economic Growth: Evidence from Cross-Country Panels of Manufacturing Industries. Oxford Economic Papers, 65(3), 675-698.
  • Islam, N. (1995). Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(4), 1127-1170.
  • Janjua, Z. P. ve Samad, G. (2007). Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Growth: The Case of Middle Income Developing Countries. The Pakistan Development Review, 16(4), 711-722.
  • Kennedy, P. (2008). A Guide to Econometrics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Lee, K. ve Lee, H. C. (2008). The Miracle to Crisis and the Mirage of The Postcrisis Reform in Korea: Assessment After Ten Years. Journal of Asian Economics, 19 (5), 425-437.
  • Lerner, J. (2009). The Empirical Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation: Puzzles and Clues. American Economic Review, 99(2), 343–348.
  • Liu, W. (2016). Intellectual Property Rights, FDI, R&D and Economic Growth: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis. The World Economy, 39(7), 983-1004.
  • Magic, P. (2003). International Technology Transfer & Intellectual Property Rights. 18.02.2019 tarihindehttp://www.mba.intercol.edu/Entrepreneurship/UT%20Computer%20Science%20Course/Peter_Magic_International_IP_Rights.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  • Mankiw, G. N., Romer, D. ve Weil, N. D. (1992). A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), 407-437.
  • Maskus, E. K (1997). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer. Conference of Public-Private Initiatives After TRIPS: Brüksel.
  • Maskus, E. K (2000). Intellectual Property Rights in The Global Economy. Washington: Institute for International Economics.
  • Maskus, E. K (2014). The New Globalisation of Intellectual Property Rights: What’s New This Time? Australian Economic History Review, 54(3), 262-284.
  • Mohtadi, H. ve Ruediger, S. (2008). Intellectual Property Rights and Growth: Is there a Threshold Effect?. International Economic Journal, 28(1), 1-42.
  • Park. W. (2005). Do Intellectual Property Rights Stimulate R&D and Productivity Growth? Evidence from Cross-national and Manufacturing Industries Data. J Putnam (Ed), Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation in the Knowledge-Based Economy içinde (ss. 1-51). Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
  • Parkin, M. (2003). Economics, Cambridge: Addison Wesley.
  • Schneider, H. P. (2005). International Trade, Economic Growth and Intellectual Property Rights: A Panel Data Study of Developed and Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics,78(2), 529 – 547.
  • Seyeum, B. (1996). The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Foreign Direct Investment. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 31(1), 50-59.
  • Solow, M. R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94.
  • Tanaka, H. ve Iwaisako, T. (2014). Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment: A Welfare Analysis. European Economic Review, 67, 107–124.
  • Tatoğlu Yerdelen, F. (2013). Panel Veri Ekonometrisi. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım.
  • Thompson, A. M. ve Rushing, W. F. (1996). An Ampirical Analysis of the Impact of Patent Protection on Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Development, 21(2), 61-77.
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Gökay Canberk Buluş

İbrahim Bakırtaş

Proje Numarası 1059B141600828
Yayımlanma Tarihi 29 Aralık 2019
Kabul Tarihi 2 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019

Kaynak Göster

APA Buluş, G. C., & Bakırtaş, İ. (2019). Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 3(2), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.618383
AMA Buluş GC, Bakırtaş İ. Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme. ASED. Aralık 2019;3(2):261-278. doi:10.38122/ased.618383
Chicago Buluş, Gökay Canberk, ve İbrahim Bakırtaş. “Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme”. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 3, sy. 2 (Aralık 2019): 261-78. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.618383.
EndNote Buluş GC, Bakırtaş İ (01 Aralık 2019) Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 3 2 261–278.
IEEE G. C. Buluş ve İ. Bakırtaş, “Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme”, ASED, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 261–278, 2019, doi: 10.38122/ased.618383.
ISNAD Buluş, Gökay Canberk - Bakırtaş, İbrahim. “Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme”. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 3/2 (Aralık 2019), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.618383.
JAMA Buluş GC, Bakırtaş İ. Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme. ASED. 2019;3:261–278.
MLA Buluş, Gökay Canberk ve İbrahim Bakırtaş. “Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme”. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 3, sy. 2, 2019, ss. 261-78, doi:10.38122/ased.618383.
Vancouver Buluş GC, Bakırtaş İ. Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerinde Fikri Mülkiyet Haklarının Etkisi: Ampirik Bir İnceleme. ASED. 2019;3(2):261-78.