Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Anlamlı İş Olgusunun Kavramsallaştırılmasına Yönelik Araştırma Eğilimleri ve Tematik Örüntüler: Uluslararası Literatürün Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 363 - 386, 31.12.2025

Kubilayhan Göç

https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.1832289

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, anlamlı iş olgusunun örgütsel bağlam içerisindeki kuramsal evrimini ve kavramsal bütünlüğünü araştırmak ve ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmada anlamlı iş olgusu bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle incelenmiş, üç temel araştırma sorusunun yanıtını aranmıştır: (1) Anlamlı iş literatüründe hangi temalar ön plana çıkmış ve bu temaların zaman içindeki evrimi nasıl olmuştur? (2) Literatürde öne çıkan ülkeler, kurumlar ve araştırmacılar hangileridir ve akademik üretkenlik açısından nasıl bir liderlik dağılımı söz konusudur? (3) Anlamlı iş literatüründeki mevcut boşluklar göz önüne alındığında, gelecekteki araştırmalar hangi alanlara/konulara odaklanmalıdır? Araştırmanın örneklemi 2000-2024 yılları arasında Scopus ve Web of Science veri tabanında yayımlanan 173 yayından oluşmaktadır. Analizde Biblioshiny (R tabanlı bibliyometrik analiz yazılımı) kullanılarak atıf analizi, h-indeksi, Lotka Yasası, tematik haritalama ve ortak yazarlık ağı analizleri uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, 2016-2017 döneminden itibaren anlamlı iş çalışmalarının arttığını, 2021 itibariyle ise literatüre yerleşmeye başladığını göstermektedir. Yayın sayısındaki artışa rağmen, alan henüz genç, dağınık ve süreklilik göstermeyen bir yapıya sahiptir. Uluslararası iş birliği ağı analizleri, ABD, Hindistan ve Çin’in alanda öncü konumda olduğunu, Türkiye’nin ise akademik üretkenlik açısından geride kaldığını göstermektedir. Ağ analizleri, anlamlı çalışmanın tekil bir kavram olmadığını; iş tasarımı, çalışan katılımı, psikolojik güçlendirme, kurumsal bağlılık, iş tatmini ve değerleri içeren daha geniş bir kavramsal ekosistemin merkezindeki bir tema haline geldiğini göstermektedir. Çalışma, anlamlı iş araştırmalarındaki mevcut araştırma eğilimlerini ortaya koymakta ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için rehber niteliğinde öneriler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İş tasarımı Anlamlı iş İş özellikleri Bibliyometrik analliz

Kaynakça

  • Ancarlı, S. E., Karaca, S. S., & Başcı, E. S. (2023). Blockchain kripto varlık bitcoin üzerine bibliyometrik bir analiz web of science uygulaması. Uluslararası Muhasebe ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 44-72.
  • Asik-Dizdar, O., & Esen, A. (2016). Sensemaking at work: meaningful work experience for individuals and organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(1), 2-17.
  • Akter, S., Uddin, M. H., ve Tajuddin, A. H. (2021). Knowledge mapping of microfinance performance research: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(3), 399–418.
  • Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Shah, M. H., Madichie, N., Paul, J., & Choudrie, J. (2021). Keeping customers' data secure: A cross-cultural study of cybersecurity compliance among the GenMobile workforce. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106531.
  • Aria, M., ve Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Bailey, C., Lips‐Wiersma, M., Madden, A., Yeoman, R., Thompson, M., & Chalofsky, N. (2019). The five paradoxes of meaningful work: Introduction to the special issue ‘meaningful work: Prospects for the 21st century’. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 481-499.
  • Bezner Kerr, R., Liebert, J., Kansanga, M., & Kpienbaareh, D. (2022). Human and social values in agroecology: A review. Elem Sci Anth, 10(1), 00090.
  • Chawla, V., & Guda, S. (2017). Salesperson’s spirituality: impact on customer orientation and adaptability. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(3), 408-424.
  • Dimitrov, D. (2012). Sources of meaningfulness in the workplace: A study in the US hospitality sector. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(2/3), 351-371.
  • Fletcher, L., & Schofield, K. (2021). Facilitating meaningfulness in the workplace: A field intervention study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(14), 2975- 3003.
  • Goh, E., & Baum, T. (2021). Job perceptions of Generation Z hotel employees towards working in Covid-19 quarantine hotels: the role of meaningful work. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1688-1710.
  • Gosetti, G. (2017). Sustainable agriculture and quality of working life: Analytical perspectives and confirmation from research. Sustainability, 9(10), 1749.
  • Granger, S., Caza, B. B., Ashford, S. J., & Reid, E. M. (2022). Adapting to a jolt: A mixed methods study identifying challenges and personal resources impacting professional gig workers' wellbeing during COVID-19. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138, 103784.
  • Gutberlet, J. (2012). Informal and cooperative recycling as a poverty eradication strategy. Geography Compass, 6(1), 19-34.
  • Harpaz, I., & Fu, X. (2002). The structure of the meaning of work: A relative stability amidst change. Human Relations, 55(6), 639-667.
  • Hattrup, K., Mueller, K., & Joens, I. (2007). The effects of nations and organisations on work value importance: A cross‐cultural investigation. Applied Psychology, 56(3), 479-499.
  • Joelle, M., & Coelho, A. M. (2019). The impact of spirituality at work on workers’ attitudes and individual performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(7), 1111-1135.
  • Khusanova, R., Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2021). Work engagement among public employees: Antecedents and consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 684495.
  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Thriving on demand: Challenging work results in employee flourishing through appraisals and resources. International Journal of Stress Management, 27(2), 111.
  • Komase, Y., Watanabe, K., Sasaki, N., & Kawakami, N. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS). Journal of Occupational Health, 62(1), e12185.
  • Kuchinke, K. P., Ardichvili, A., Borchert, M., Cornachione Jr, E. B., Cseh, M., Kang, H. S., ... & Zav'jalova, E. (2011). Work meaning among mid‐level professional employees: A study of the importance of work centrality and extrinsic and intrinsic work goals in eight countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 264-284.
  • Kumar, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). Workplace spirituality as a moderator in relation between stress and health: An exploratory empirical assessment. International Review of Psychiatry, 26(3), 344-351.
  • Lee, S. (2015). A concept analysis of ‘Meaning in work’and its implications for nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(10), 2258-2267.
  • Li, J., Fu, H., Hu, Y., Shang, L. I., Wu, Y., Kristensen, T. S., ... & Hasselhorn, H. M. (2010). Psychosocial work environment and intention to leave the nursing profession: results from the longitudinal Chinese NEXT study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(3_suppl), 69-80.
  • Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2024). How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research. Journal of Business Research, 182, 114760.
  • Lin, P. M., Au, W. C., Leung, V. T., & Peng, K. L. (2020). Exploring the meaning of work within the sharing economy: A case of food-delivery workers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102686.
  • Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 374-389.
  • Martela, F., Gómez, M., Unanue, W., Araya, S., Bravo, D., & Espejo, A. (2021). What makes work meaningful? Longitudinal evidence for the importance of autonomy and beneficence for meaningful work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103631.
  • Martela, F., & Riekki, T. J. (2018). Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 327587.
  • Michaelson, C. (2021). A normative meaning of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 413-428.
  • Palumbo, R., Flamini, G., Gnan, L., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2023). Looking for meanings at work: unraveling the implications of smart working on organizational meaningfulness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(3), 624-645.
  • Panda, A., Sinha, S., & Jain, N. K. (2022). Job meaningfulness, employee engagement, supervisory support and job performance: a moderated-mediation analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(6), 2316-2336.
  • Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering Meaningfulness in Working and at Work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (pp. 309-327). San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
  • Ribeiro, M. A., Silva, F. F., & Figueiredo, P. M. (2016). Discussing the notion of decent work: Senses of working for a group of Brazilian workers without college education. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 207.
  • Saraiva, M., & Nogueiro, T. (2025). Perspectives and Realities of Disengagement Among Younger Generation Y and Z Workers in Contemporary Work Dynamics. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 133.
  • Sharabi, M. (2009). Work values, employment and ethnicity: Jewish and Muslim academic graduates in Israel. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 398-409.
  • Singh, N., Tyagi, H., & Bamel, U. (2020). Impact of transactional, relational and balanced contract on affective commitment: meaningful work as mediator. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(1), 131-149.
  • Sparrow, P. R. (2000). New employee behaviours, work designs and forms of work organization: what is in store for the future of work?. Journal of managerial psychology, 15(3), 202-218.
  • Supanti, D., & Butcher, K. (2019). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) participation the pathway to foster meaningful work and helping behavior for millennials?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 8-18.
  • Templer, A., Armstrong‐Stassen, M., & Cattaneo, J. (2010). Antecedents of older workers' motives for continuing to work. Career Development International, 15(5), 479-500.
  • Van Wingerden, J., & Van der Stoep, J. (2018). The motivational potential of meaningful work: Relationships with strengths use, work engagement, and performance. PloS one, 13(6), e0197599.
  • Vu, M. C., & Burton, N. (2022). The influence of spiritual traditions on the interplay of subjective and normative interpretations of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 543-566.
  • Woodard, M. S., Miller, J. K., Miller, D. J., Silvernail, K. D., Guo, C., Nair, S., ... & Peters, L. M. (2016). A cross-cultural examination of preferences for work attributes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), 702-719.

Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 363 - 386, 31.12.2025

Kubilayhan Göç

https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.1832289

Öz

This study aims to investigate the theoretical evolution and conceptual integrity of the phenomenon of meaningful work within the organizational context. The phenomenon of meaningful work is examined in this study using bibliometric analysis. It seeks to answer three primary research questions: (1) Which themes are prominent in the meaningful work literature, and how have these themes evolved? (2) Which countries, institutions, and researchers are prominent in the literature, and what is the distribution of leadership in terms of academic productivity? (3) Given the existing gaps in the meaningful work literature, which areas/topics should future research focus on? The research sample comprises 173 publications, published in Scopus and Web of Science databases, between 2000 and 2024. Citation analysis, h-index, Lotka's Law, thematic mapping, and co-authorship network analyses were applied in the analysis using Biblioshiny (R-based bibliometric analysis software). The findings indicate that studies on meaningful work have increased since 2016-2017 and have begun to gain traction in the literature by 2021. Despite the growth in publications, the field remains young and fragmented. Analyses of international collaboration networks indicate that the United States, India, and China are leading the field. At the same time, Türkiye lags in terms of academic productivity. Network analyses reveal that meaningful work is not a singular concept; it has become a central theme within a broader conceptual ecosystem that encompasses job design, employee engagement, psychological empowerment, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and values. The study presents current research trends in meaningful work research and offers recommendations that serve as guidelines for future research.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Meaningful Work Job Design Job Characteristics Bibliometric Analysis

Kaynakça

  • Ancarlı, S. E., Karaca, S. S., & Başcı, E. S. (2023). Blockchain kripto varlık bitcoin üzerine bibliyometrik bir analiz web of science uygulaması. Uluslararası Muhasebe ve Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 44-72.
  • Asik-Dizdar, O., & Esen, A. (2016). Sensemaking at work: meaningful work experience for individuals and organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 24(1), 2-17.
  • Akter, S., Uddin, M. H., ve Tajuddin, A. H. (2021). Knowledge mapping of microfinance performance research: a bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(3), 399–418.
  • Ameen, N., Tarhini, A., Shah, M. H., Madichie, N., Paul, J., & Choudrie, J. (2021). Keeping customers' data secure: A cross-cultural study of cybersecurity compliance among the GenMobile workforce. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106531.
  • Aria, M., ve Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975.
  • Bailey, C., Lips‐Wiersma, M., Madden, A., Yeoman, R., Thompson, M., & Chalofsky, N. (2019). The five paradoxes of meaningful work: Introduction to the special issue ‘meaningful work: Prospects for the 21st century’. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 481-499.
  • Bezner Kerr, R., Liebert, J., Kansanga, M., & Kpienbaareh, D. (2022). Human and social values in agroecology: A review. Elem Sci Anth, 10(1), 00090.
  • Chawla, V., & Guda, S. (2017). Salesperson’s spirituality: impact on customer orientation and adaptability. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(3), 408-424.
  • Dimitrov, D. (2012). Sources of meaningfulness in the workplace: A study in the US hospitality sector. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(2/3), 351-371.
  • Fletcher, L., & Schofield, K. (2021). Facilitating meaningfulness in the workplace: A field intervention study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(14), 2975- 3003.
  • Goh, E., & Baum, T. (2021). Job perceptions of Generation Z hotel employees towards working in Covid-19 quarantine hotels: the role of meaningful work. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1688-1710.
  • Gosetti, G. (2017). Sustainable agriculture and quality of working life: Analytical perspectives and confirmation from research. Sustainability, 9(10), 1749.
  • Granger, S., Caza, B. B., Ashford, S. J., & Reid, E. M. (2022). Adapting to a jolt: A mixed methods study identifying challenges and personal resources impacting professional gig workers' wellbeing during COVID-19. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138, 103784.
  • Gutberlet, J. (2012). Informal and cooperative recycling as a poverty eradication strategy. Geography Compass, 6(1), 19-34.
  • Harpaz, I., & Fu, X. (2002). The structure of the meaning of work: A relative stability amidst change. Human Relations, 55(6), 639-667.
  • Hattrup, K., Mueller, K., & Joens, I. (2007). The effects of nations and organisations on work value importance: A cross‐cultural investigation. Applied Psychology, 56(3), 479-499.
  • Joelle, M., & Coelho, A. M. (2019). The impact of spirituality at work on workers’ attitudes and individual performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(7), 1111-1135.
  • Khusanova, R., Kang, S. W., & Choi, S. B. (2021). Work engagement among public employees: Antecedents and consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 684495.
  • Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Thriving on demand: Challenging work results in employee flourishing through appraisals and resources. International Journal of Stress Management, 27(2), 111.
  • Komase, Y., Watanabe, K., Sasaki, N., & Kawakami, N. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS). Journal of Occupational Health, 62(1), e12185.
  • Kuchinke, K. P., Ardichvili, A., Borchert, M., Cornachione Jr, E. B., Cseh, M., Kang, H. S., ... & Zav'jalova, E. (2011). Work meaning among mid‐level professional employees: A study of the importance of work centrality and extrinsic and intrinsic work goals in eight countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 49(3), 264-284.
  • Kumar, V., & Kumar, S. (2014). Workplace spirituality as a moderator in relation between stress and health: An exploratory empirical assessment. International Review of Psychiatry, 26(3), 344-351.
  • Lee, S. (2015). A concept analysis of ‘Meaning in work’and its implications for nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(10), 2258-2267.
  • Li, J., Fu, H., Hu, Y., Shang, L. I., Wu, Y., Kristensen, T. S., ... & Hasselhorn, H. M. (2010). Psychosocial work environment and intention to leave the nursing profession: results from the longitudinal Chinese NEXT study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(3_suppl), 69-80.
  • Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2024). How to combine and clean bibliometric data and use bibliometric tools synergistically: Guidelines using metaverse research. Journal of Business Research, 182, 114760.
  • Lin, P. M., Au, W. C., Leung, V. T., & Peng, K. L. (2020). Exploring the meaning of work within the sharing economy: A case of food-delivery workers. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102686.
  • Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J., Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 374-389.
  • Martela, F., Gómez, M., Unanue, W., Araya, S., Bravo, D., & Espejo, A. (2021). What makes work meaningful? Longitudinal evidence for the importance of autonomy and beneficence for meaningful work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103631.
  • Martela, F., & Riekki, T. J. (2018). Autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of the four pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 327587.
  • Michaelson, C. (2021). A normative meaning of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 170(3), 413-428.
  • Palumbo, R., Flamini, G., Gnan, L., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2023). Looking for meanings at work: unraveling the implications of smart working on organizational meaningfulness. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(3), 624-645.
  • Panda, A., Sinha, S., & Jain, N. K. (2022). Job meaningfulness, employee engagement, supervisory support and job performance: a moderated-mediation analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(6), 2316-2336.
  • Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering Meaningfulness in Working and at Work. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (pp. 309-327). San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
  • Ribeiro, M. A., Silva, F. F., & Figueiredo, P. M. (2016). Discussing the notion of decent work: Senses of working for a group of Brazilian workers without college education. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 207.
  • Saraiva, M., & Nogueiro, T. (2025). Perspectives and Realities of Disengagement Among Younger Generation Y and Z Workers in Contemporary Work Dynamics. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 133.
  • Sharabi, M. (2009). Work values, employment and ethnicity: Jewish and Muslim academic graduates in Israel. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 398-409.
  • Singh, N., Tyagi, H., & Bamel, U. (2020). Impact of transactional, relational and balanced contract on affective commitment: meaningful work as mediator. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 70(1), 131-149.
  • Sparrow, P. R. (2000). New employee behaviours, work designs and forms of work organization: what is in store for the future of work?. Journal of managerial psychology, 15(3), 202-218.
  • Supanti, D., & Butcher, K. (2019). Is corporate social responsibility (CSR) participation the pathway to foster meaningful work and helping behavior for millennials?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 8-18.
  • Templer, A., Armstrong‐Stassen, M., & Cattaneo, J. (2010). Antecedents of older workers' motives for continuing to work. Career Development International, 15(5), 479-500.
  • Van Wingerden, J., & Van der Stoep, J. (2018). The motivational potential of meaningful work: Relationships with strengths use, work engagement, and performance. PloS one, 13(6), e0197599.
  • Vu, M. C., & Burton, N. (2022). The influence of spiritual traditions on the interplay of subjective and normative interpretations of meaningful work. Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2), 543-566.
  • Woodard, M. S., Miller, J. K., Miller, D. J., Silvernail, K. D., Guo, C., Nair, S., ... & Peters, L. M. (2016). A cross-cultural examination of preferences for work attributes. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(3), 702-719.
Toplam 43 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Politika ve Yönetim (Diğer), Endüstriyel ve Örgütsel Psikoloji (İnsan Faktörleri Dahil)
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Kubilayhan Göç 0000-0002-7481-0837

Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Kasım 2025
Kabul Tarihi 17 Aralık 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Göç, K. (2025). Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(2), 363-386. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.1832289
AMA Göç K. Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature. ASED. Aralık 2025;9(2):363-386. doi:10.38122/ased.1832289
Chicago Göç, Kubilayhan. “Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature”. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9, sy. 2 (Aralık 2025): 363-86. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.1832289.
EndNote Göç K (01 Aralık 2025) Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9 2 363–386.
IEEE K. Göç, “Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature”, ASED, c. 9, sy. 2, ss. 363–386, 2025, doi: 10.38122/ased.1832289.
ISNAD Göç, Kubilayhan. “Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature”. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9/2 (Aralık2025), 363-386. https://doi.org/10.38122/ased.1832289.
JAMA Göç K. Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature. ASED. 2025;9:363–386.
MLA Göç, Kubilayhan. “Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature”. Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 9, sy. 2, 2025, ss. 363-86, doi:10.38122/ased.1832289.
Vancouver Göç K. Research Trends and Thematic Patterns in the Conceptualization of Meaningful Work: A Bibliometric Analysis of International Literature. ASED. 2025;9(2):363-86.