Sistematik Derlemeler ve Meta Analiz
Yıl 2023,
Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 16 - 28, 01.07.2023
Öz
Kaynakça
- Anagün, Ş. S., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z., & Yaşar, S. (2016). The development of a 21st century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.9779/puje768
- Aydın, A., & Sarıer, Y. (2013). Investıgation of the relationship between the leadership of educational administrators and school outcomes, using the method of meta-analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice.
- Cemaloğlu, N., Arslangilay, A. S., Üstündağ, M. T. & Bilasa, P. (2019). 21st century skills self-efficacy perceptions of vocational high school teachers. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 20 (2), 845-874. Retrieved from
- Çalmaşur, H., Demir, D., & Doğan, S. (2015). Classroom teachers' opinions on the concept of leadership and leadership behaviour they expect from primary school administrators. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, Special Issue on XIV. International Participation Symposium of Primary School Teacher Education (21-23 May, 2015) p. 62-73. https://doi.org/10.14686/BUEFAD.2015USOSOzelsayi13198
- Düzgün, S. (2022). The Relationship Between School Administrators' Technological Leadership Self-Efficacy and Their Views on Distance Education. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 42(2), 1243– 1274.
- Elekoğlu, F., & Demirdağ, S. (2020). Investigation of school principals' 21st century skills, communication skills, and leadership styles according to teachers' perceptions. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(8), 101–117.
- Ergin, D. Y. (1991). Sampling. Atatürk University Journal of Faculty of Education, 3, 111–124.
- Fullan, M. G. (2008). Education for continuous improvement. Patio-Revista Pedagogica, March.
- Görgülü, D., & Küçükali, R. (2013). The Research of the School Administrators’ Technologic Leadership Competence in the Course of Transition to Information Society (A Case Study of Konya) (Vol. 173). Atatürk Üniversity.
- Güçlü, N., & Kuuk, Ö. (2019). The perceptıon of the school principals working at primary and secondary schools about 21th century skills. Eğitim araştırmaları-2019 (E. Babaoğlan Çelik, E. Kıral, & A. Çilek (eds.)). www.eyuder.org.
- Gültekin, F. (2013). Self efficacy perceptions of Secondar School Administrators in Technology Leadership. Master thesis. Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences. İstanbul.
- Gün, F., & Çoban, Ö. (2019). Examination of school administrators’ technologic leadership selfefficacy. International Journal of Karamanoglu Mehmetbey Educational Research, 1(1), 39–48.
- Gürkan, H., & Toprakcı, E. (2018). Professional development of elementary school principals. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 64–81. https://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.434582
- Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Dalgıç, G. (2010). Views of teachers, administrators and supervisors regarding the technological leadership standards for administrators. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 537–577.
- Karen Miller, K. (2018). The professional development of successful principals: Adult learning and leading. Professional Development in Education.
- Olea, M. (2020). The challenging role of school principal in diverse and changing communities: A qualitive study (Issue January).
- Peker, S., & Selçuk, G. (2011). The effect of the efficiency of the headmasters on the education period. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 472–480.
- Sağbaş, H. (2019). A research on the technological leadership competences of secondary school administrators. Master thesis. Ege University, İzmir.
- Seven, T. (2021). The relationship between school managers' technological leadership self-efficiency and their distance education attitudes. Master thesis. İstanbul Kültür University Graduate Institute, İstanbul, Türkiye.
- Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2019). Örneklendirilmiş Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Anı Publisher, Ankara.
- Ulukaya, F. (2015). Relationship between school administrators' technology leadership self-efficacy and their level of education and training (Tokat Province Example). Master thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Türkiye.
- Yeni, G. (2020). The effect of 21st century skills on school managers’ leadership aspect. International Journal of Leadership Training (IJOLT), 2(2).
- Yılmaz, E., Çalışkan, M., & Sulak, S. A. (2016). 21. yüzyıl becerileri kapsamında dönüşen okul paradigması. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
- Yılmaz, K. (2021). 21st century skills of school principals according to teachers’ views.
- Yörük, Ş. (2021). The relationship between school administrators' level of 21st Century skills and their capability to manage change at schools. Master thesis. Uşak University, Uşak, Türkiye.
Exploring the relationship between technological leadership self-efficacy of primary school administrators and 21st century skills
Öz
This study aims to investigate the relationship between primary school administrators' technological leadership self-efficacy and 21st century skills. Employing descriptive (survey) research method, the opinions of the primary school administrators working in the state primary schools in the districts of Konya were examined. The Education Administrators Technological Leadership Self-Efficacy Scale and the 21st Century Skills and Competences Scale Directed at Teaching Candidates were administered. In order to analyse the data collected in the study, in which 272 questionnaire responses were collected, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, percentage, t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlation test and Cohen's d test were performed. The results revealed that primary school administrators' perceptions of technological leadership self-efficacy turned out to be at adequate level. It was also seen that there was no significant difference in terms of technological leadership levels of administrators in line with gender and professional experience. It was seen that school administrators' consider 21st century skills important. The results also indicated that there was no significant difference between primary school administrators' perception of 21st century skills and gender, experience, and age. In addition, there is a significant difference between primary school administrators' perceptions of 21st century skills and the variables of position and educational status. The findings also showed that there is a positive, moderate, and significant relationship between the sum and dimensions of primary school administrators' technological leadership behaviours and the sum and dimensions of 21st century skills.
Anahtar Kelimeler
leadership technological leadership 21st century skills primary school administrator self-efficacy
Kaynakça
- Anagün, Ş. S., Atalay, N., Kılıç, Z., & Yaşar, S. (2016). The development of a 21st century skills and competences scale directed at teaching candidates: validity and reliability study. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 40, 160–175. https://doi.org/10.9779/puje768
- Aydın, A., & Sarıer, Y. (2013). Investıgation of the relationship between the leadership of educational administrators and school outcomes, using the method of meta-analysis. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice.
- Cemaloğlu, N., Arslangilay, A. S., Üstündağ, M. T. & Bilasa, P. (2019). 21st century skills self-efficacy perceptions of vocational high school teachers. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 20 (2), 845-874. Retrieved from
- Çalmaşur, H., Demir, D., & Doğan, S. (2015). Classroom teachers' opinions on the concept of leadership and leadership behaviour they expect from primary school administrators. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, Special Issue on XIV. International Participation Symposium of Primary School Teacher Education (21-23 May, 2015) p. 62-73. https://doi.org/10.14686/BUEFAD.2015USOSOzelsayi13198
- Düzgün, S. (2022). The Relationship Between School Administrators' Technological Leadership Self-Efficacy and Their Views on Distance Education. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 42(2), 1243– 1274.
- Elekoğlu, F., & Demirdağ, S. (2020). Investigation of school principals' 21st century skills, communication skills, and leadership styles according to teachers' perceptions. Karaelmas Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(8), 101–117.
- Ergin, D. Y. (1991). Sampling. Atatürk University Journal of Faculty of Education, 3, 111–124.
- Fullan, M. G. (2008). Education for continuous improvement. Patio-Revista Pedagogica, March.
- Görgülü, D., & Küçükali, R. (2013). The Research of the School Administrators’ Technologic Leadership Competence in the Course of Transition to Information Society (A Case Study of Konya) (Vol. 173). Atatürk Üniversity.
- Güçlü, N., & Kuuk, Ö. (2019). The perceptıon of the school principals working at primary and secondary schools about 21th century skills. Eğitim araştırmaları-2019 (E. Babaoğlan Çelik, E. Kıral, & A. Çilek (eds.)). www.eyuder.org.
- Gültekin, F. (2013). Self efficacy perceptions of Secondar School Administrators in Technology Leadership. Master thesis. Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Educational Sciences. İstanbul.
- Gün, F., & Çoban, Ö. (2019). Examination of school administrators’ technologic leadership selfefficacy. International Journal of Karamanoglu Mehmetbey Educational Research, 1(1), 39–48.
- Gürkan, H., & Toprakcı, E. (2018). Professional development of elementary school principals. e-International Journal of Educational Research, 64–81. https://doi.org/10.19160/ijer.434582
- Hacıfazlıoğlu, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Dalgıç, G. (2010). Views of teachers, administrators and supervisors regarding the technological leadership standards for administrators. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 537–577.
- Karen Miller, K. (2018). The professional development of successful principals: Adult learning and leading. Professional Development in Education.
- Olea, M. (2020). The challenging role of school principal in diverse and changing communities: A qualitive study (Issue January).
- Peker, S., & Selçuk, G. (2011). The effect of the efficiency of the headmasters on the education period. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 472–480.
- Sağbaş, H. (2019). A research on the technological leadership competences of secondary school administrators. Master thesis. Ege University, İzmir.
- Seven, T. (2021). The relationship between school managers' technological leadership self-efficiency and their distance education attitudes. Master thesis. İstanbul Kültür University Graduate Institute, İstanbul, Türkiye.
- Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2019). Örneklendirilmiş Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Anı Publisher, Ankara.
- Ulukaya, F. (2015). Relationship between school administrators' technology leadership self-efficacy and their level of education and training (Tokat Province Example). Master thesis, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Türkiye.
- Yeni, G. (2020). The effect of 21st century skills on school managers’ leadership aspect. International Journal of Leadership Training (IJOLT), 2(2).
- Yılmaz, E., Çalışkan, M., & Sulak, S. A. (2016). 21. yüzyıl becerileri kapsamında dönüşen okul paradigması. Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi.
- Yılmaz, K. (2021). 21st century skills of school principals according to teachers’ views.
- Yörük, Ş. (2021). The relationship between school administrators' level of 21st Century skills and their capability to manage change at schools. Master thesis. Uşak University, Uşak, Türkiye.
Toplam 25 adet kaynakça vardır.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Konular | Alan Eğitimleri |
| Bölüm | Research Articles |
| Yazarlar | |
| Erken Görünüm Tarihi | 6 Temmuz 2023 |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 1 Temmuz 2023 |
| Kabul Tarihi | 18 Mayıs 2023 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4 |
